What should be checked before relying on a WPI figure?
Check maximum medical improvement, the body area, objective findings, the NSW Guideline chapter and any NSW modification before relying on a percentage.
Permanent impairment assessment
Pelvic Fracture WPI Assessment NSW explains how a NSW workers compensation WPI assessment is usually approached, what medical findings matter and what evidence should be checked before relying on a percentage.
Check maximum medical improvement, the body area, objective findings, the NSW Guideline chapter and any NSW modification before relying on a percentage.
No. WPI depends on an assessor, maximum medical improvement, objective findings and the NSW Guidelines. This page is general information only.
Permanent impairment assessment
Pelvic fracture WPI depends on the precise pelvic structure, healing, residual displacement, internal fixation or ankylosis. NSW Table 4.3 includes exact rows for pelvic bones, pubic symphysis, sacroiliac injury, coccyx and multiple pelvic injuries. Do not use a generic fracture percentage.
Assessment source: Assessment source: NSW Guidelines Chapter 4, Table 4.3 permanent impairment for fractures involving the pelvis.
This section is source-backed general information. It is not a WPI assessment and is not legal advice.
If an impairment percentage, medical assessment or insurer decision is affecting your NSW injury claim, send the decision or report for a practical review. This is general information only and does not guarantee any result.
Request a free claim checkThe assessment scope for Pelvic Fracture WPI Assessment should be stated precisely before any percentage is considered. The file should identify whether that label describes the primary diagnosed condition, a symptom of another injury, a regional overview or one component of a broader impairment. Findings from another body area or diagnosis should not be transferred without explanation. The report should connect the stated condition to the correct NSW Guideline chapter, objective findings, treatment history and any permitted combination or apportionment method. This distinction is particularly important where similar page labels cover different clinical questions.
Permanent impairment should generally be assessed when the condition is stable and unlikely to change substantially in the next year. Treatment, surgery and rehabilitation history may affect whether the timing is appropriate.
The NSW Guidelines adopt AMA5 in many areas, but NSW modifications prevail. Do not assume an AMA5 table applies without checking the NSW chapter and any public SIRA clarification.
A useful assessment file separates diagnosis, objective findings, surgery history, work capacity issues, apportionment questions and the body-area method used by the assessor.
Ask about an impairment issueDocuments and records
The useful records depend on how the injury happened, when symptoms were recorded and how treatment or work capacity changed.
Common questions
Short general answers only. The right next step depends on the facts, dates and documents.
No. WPI is a medical impairment measure. Work capacity, weekly payments, damages, treatment disputes and TPD issues are separate questions, although the evidence may overlap.
Not by itself. NSW workers compensation excludes AMA5 Chapter 18 on pain. Chronic pain is assessed through the underlying diagnosed condition where the Guidelines permit it.
In NSW workers compensation, secondary psychiatric or psychological impairment is not assessed as permanent impairment. Primary psychological impairment is assessed separately and is not combined with physical WPI.
Injury pathway enquiry
Start with how the injury happened, what medical records exist and how work or daily activity has changed. The same injury can sit in different pathways.